Gender Jumper (
genderjumper) wrote2024-03-25 02:18 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Neuro+Queer but not Neuroqueer?
Just learned that the person who first coined "neuroqueer" isn't someone whose work I want to be boosting, but I haven't heard any viable alternatives, so I'm wrestling with that.
There is a demonstrated correlation between neurodivergent traits and LGBTQ+ identities, so it only makes sense to have an intersectional term for someone whose neurodivergence affects their interest/ability in performing assigned gender. I doubt she's going to make any money off it at this point, but is that justification enough for continuing to use it?
There is a demonstrated correlation between neurodivergent traits and LGBTQ+ identities, so it only makes sense to have an intersectional term for someone whose neurodivergence affects their interest/ability in performing assigned gender. I doubt she's going to make any money off it at this point, but is that justification enough for continuing to use it?
no subject
I think that stopped clocks are right twice a day, and that if we held out for moral rectitude in inventors and coiners of phrases, we would be waiting a long time for anyone to pass the bars we would wind up setting. So I’ll use the term until the creator gets unmasked as an actual fascist or something. I will draw lines around some stuff (eventually), but mostly I am cool with using any available tools to deconstruct kyriarchal hegemony.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
Extending the confusion
It sounds like the critiques are not so much about Nick Walker saying and doing things explicitly hostile so much as being deep in an overly prescriptive, highly academic perspective and resisting criticism about how many folks get left out when that discourse happens at a high-level.
I've also been corrected that Dr. Walker prefers to think of "neuroqueering" the verb rather than a noun, though I'm not sure if that's a) true for others who have spontaneously come up with the same term or b) realistic given its widespread visibility already.
More ambivalences about self-applying the term, but now for new reasons! [sigh]