genderjumper: cartoon giraffe, chewing greens, wearing cap & bells (Default)
Long and rambly, but human. )
genderjumper: cartoon giraffe, chewing greens, wearing cap & bells (Default)
For someone whose life has often been filled with alcoholics, poor coping mechanisms, and unlicensed pharmacists, I am actually rather terrible at recognizing when someone is under the influence, let alone has an addiction. I recently wrote here about how my fear of chemical dependence became my first step breaking away from the pitfalls of my family of origin, but it's been a recurring tension across many contexts throughout my life.

I literally grew up in bars... )
genderjumper: cartoon giraffe, chewing greens, wearing cap & bells (Default)

Back when I was facilitating Poly101s/201s, I think we struggled to get to the questions underneath the questions; this entry's title came to me as one of the simplest questions that doesn't get asked and, as such, hinders so many people's understanding of their own relational values. Ethics, orientation, priorities, negotiation, a lot of it comes back to this:

"If there were no emotional, logistical, or financial hindrances nor benefits to doing so, would you pursue sexual pleasure for its own sake (and if so, how much)?"

This is also my quick and dirty measure of what someone may have of their place on the asexual spectrum (which is a real and valid phenomenon, but I have seen interpreted in such extremes as to supplant the existence of what we used to call "chemistry" (as in, "those two have a real chemistry together," I wonder if they'll fuck? Honestly "alchemy" might be better used here, but that's a whole other topic). 

Anyway, I think a lot of people would have difficulty answering the question, and that's a good thing. They should slow down and pay attention to how their answers vary from others'.

Religious and hyper-monogamous types are pretty straightforward: the answer is no because it is wrong or undesirable to them. You're not going to convince them otherwise, nor should you! (Shoutout to my college sweetheart, who at the tender age of 44 recently had nonromantic sex for the first time. I'm so proud!) Others are fully asexual and would prefer to pursue some other kind of pleasure guilt-free. A very very few of us will be able to answer in the straightforward, "Yes, absolutely." We may or may not have higher libidos than average, but we are significantly less encumbered with moral and cultural scripts about what sex is "supposed to" connote than others. Either we grew up with fewer of them or we've done a lot of personal work to unpack and reevaluate them (and perhaps most frequently a bit of both, as in my own case). And we, of course, still have to think carefully about the rest of the question, because there is reality behind the abstract: if we were to construct our lives in such a way that pleasure were more easily accessible, what would we be willing to sacrifice? Time? Status? Emotions?

The overwhelming majority of folks I've met would have difficulty accepting the premise, because they have never been able (whether from external influence or internal enforcement) to disentangle their own values from the values others have placed on them. Pleasure has baggage for them, and this baggage is the real reason for asking the question. "What are you holding onto that makes this question so difficult?" Their character, meanwhile, is demonstrated by how they might sit with such discomfort: are they intrigued, frustrated, or even upset? Not many people (nonmonogamous or otherwise) are any good at negotiating multiple relationships, power dynamics (real or imagined), and social exile for making an unpopular choice unless they have leaned into such inquiry.

genderjumper: cartoon giraffe, chewing greens, wearing cap & bells (Default)

My long-distance dating partner (I still don't have a very good term for us... our dates were 99% walking until they moved out of state and we finally got to hook up in June)* coined this analogy. It's for when you need a relationship check-in that may be substantive or not, but it definitely requires some dedicated time and attention to find out.

As much as I still whinge about the 10-year partner who slow-ghosted me a few years back, she showed me a lot of insights and behaviors that improved my ability to have relationships at all, let alone nonmonogamous ones. I'm reminded this time of a night that I ended up making out with 2-3 people in one night and set up the check-in afterward to be devastating: "Hey. I'm sorry this is out of the blue, but something happened. We need to check in." Then when I told her, she didn't say, "This could've been an email!" but she did say I had oversold it quite a lot. And after that, I got better about meta-communicating (a term I coined, though it's intuitive and I hope it catches on, whether from me or not) when asking for a check-in. So that conversation would have looked more like, "Hey, I had a little fun last night! Nothing earth-shaking, but let me know when you want to check-in about it."

That really came in handy with my nesting relationship, because nesting partner has zero tolerance for unnecessary information and knows that I am notorious for crushing and squishing and (at least before the pandemic) playing around without big risks or commitments. She's demiromantic and finds a lot of processing tedious. "I only need to know if you're falling in love or changing barrier habits."

Even then, I sometimes blurt things out before she's ready (or when she's expecting a different kind of conversation), so I'm going to tell her about this analogy and see if she wants to use it in the future. "Hey, I have an update ready. Would you like to download now or schedule it for later?" Knowing her, she'd want to know how big the update is going to be -- are we talking resume use in 90 seconds or mandatory reboot after an hour? -- which is perfectly reasonable.

*DJ Jazzy Jeff and The Fresh Prince coined "creative dating associate" in their 1990 classic "A Dog Is a Dog" about the freedom to date around before settling down. Not exactly a nonmonogamy cornerstone, but at least a cornerstone of "Don't rush into monogamy."

genderjumper: cartoon giraffe, chewing greens, wearing cap & bells (Default)

When we met, it was in a room full of peers, all flirty and attractively weird teens trying out for a recurring drama project. Then there was summer training and monthly meetings, intimate spaces where people laid in each other's laps and understood stillness. Then there were actual performances, though I barely remember us going together, and then our open house with family, which I missed for some devastating reason. I had a crush on her, but I had a crush on almost every girl in the room. I just loved the proximity of it all.

We stayed connected in the interim year, but nothing frequent or deep. She didn't come back while I was lost and afraid and just kept showing up without ever really asking the director. She, now a junior, was busy with her own school's theater program; I, a recent graduate who had failed to get into my dream school or have a backup plan, was languishing in limbo, from the minimum wage job to the clinically depressed girlfriend-roommate. 

It wasn't until I was finally away at NYU that she told me. We were chatting on AIM about my new girlfriend (not the depressed one, but a respectable one who never really asked me, just sort of started calling me her boyfriend and I didn't argue). She was flirting, like we did, but when I laughed it off she clapped back:

"I'm serious. I was in love with you, ___ ___." Full name and everything.

I couldn't tell if she was hurt, only that she was serious. I was so stunned I didn't ask any of the questions in my mind. I just took a dramatic breath (this was before the days when you could see someone was typing a response) and answered,

"Then I'm the fool." Lacking any finesse whatsoever, I told her that I didn't think my new relationship would last very long and maybe some day we could find out what was possible.

We didn't really discuss it after that, but we didn't communicate any less, either. My first year at NYU was the first time I ever had high speed internet, and I chatted at least as many words as I expositioned. She wasn't even the only person to dance along the boundary between "proper" and "improper" monogamy (the month would turn into six years, but I would make it five before full-on cheating on her). But I started to get a sense of her as a person and I wanted to know more.

But we did share secrets, we discussed sex and desire, and we continued to tapdance around the boundary of flirtation that was neither harmful nor harmless.

My first winter break, we ended up spending New Year's Eve together -- not just New Year's Eve, but Y2K. My best friend from high school came along and we just wandered the park, watching people and fireworks and cutting up. We took wild photos in a statuesque nook. Her playfulness was endless. I 

(It has only been in recent years that I realized I might have or could have loved that friend -- not the cop, but the fluffy learner -- romantically, as we met years before I allowed myself sexual thoughts about a guy.)

When the night came to an end, I think I used the magnitude of the occasion and the world not ending (...it was a thing... you kind of had to be there...) to surprise myself and her by kissing her goodbye. It wasn't even midnight. I don't know what I told the cop (he knew I had a girlfriend out East and he would forever be a stickler about monogamy). I just had to let her know that I saw it, too, some kind of spark.

The next time I saw her was the following year (summer I think); she'd had breast reduction surgery to reduce her back pain and I came by to wish her well. It was the first time I'd been inside her large, expensive home, or met any of her family. I didn't stay long, and I didn't kiss her goodbye.

And from there, we just lived our separate lives. We stayed in touch on AIM, and I kept her cell number long enough to put her in my first several phones (I didn't get one until the summer I graduated NYU and moved to D.C.). Our paths never crossed and our conversations didn't spark potent memories.

Until...

One day near the start of summer, I was scrolling through my phone and talking about all the old numbers that remained there. I was talking to someone, but I couldn't tell you who. It was 2008, ten years since the drama troupe and eight since Y2K. I'd been to D.C. and back, finished my 6 years with my college sweetheart, and was two years deep into nonmonogamy. I was depressed that year, grieving a heartbreak the previous winter, and not dating as much as I had in previous years. I was looking for connection. I was curious about that sparkle.

On a whim, I texted her. She didn't recognize the number, but it was still her line. She said she was glad to hear from me, and almost immediately suggested meeting up. She sent me a picture and I barely recognized her. She explained that after the breast reduction, she'd made some different life choices, lost weight, and kept it off. I confess I was a little disappointed; not only was she just about the most attractive person of size I'd ever met, but I had way more experience connecting with fat people than thin people. I couldn't put it into words, especially since I was still pretty thin myself by most accounts, I just knew I had an easier time relating to people who had come to terms with their imperfect bodies than those who never had to.

The intimidation only got worse when we met at Barnes & Noble. I had recently started to develop a working knowledge of zodiac signs, and all I can say is that she was extremely Virgo (my opposite sign, which can evoke dangerous attraction among other things). Just when I thought she'd become coiffed and aristocratic (like the sexy, expensive dress that clung to her thighs), she'd inject the best kind of chaos (like telling me that she'd taken her panties off due to VPL). I had absolutely no idea who this person was, but I couldn't look away. 

I told her about New York, D.C., and polyamory. She told me about learning to reckon with the body she had, and her college days. She now worked in high end catering, and had recently started a relationship. We wandered the aisles and commented all the way. It was hard to look away, but sometimes it was hard to absorb this new version of her. I took strange solace in the thin smile lines on her face, a lingering artifact of the cheeks I remembered.

Over the PA came a powerful album intro that distracted me for a couple of tracks. When I confessed this to her, she grabbed my hand and marched me over the the music counter to ask the cashier. The cashier had picked it herself, and showed us the CD on display. I bought it immediately. This totem gave me strength, all the more as it continued playing overhead.

"I feel like I owe you an apology," I blurted at no point in particular.

"For what?"

"I feel like I didn't really make much sense back in the day. Like, New Year's Eve, when I kissed you. Like maybe I led you on and never showed up for you."

She turned her head but grinned potently. "Don't you remember what you told me? After?"

"After New Year's? No, I don't remember at all."

"When you got back to New York, you messaged me and you said, 'Thank you.' You said that kissing me helped you realize that she was the one for you and that you were going to focus on being present for her."

Years later, I still have no memory of these thoughts, only of her repeating them back to me. "Wow, that was kind of an asshole thing to say."

(More than kind of...)

"Yeah."

She was not locked away, nor conflicted, but I had no idea how she was feeling.

I couldn't have put it into words at the time, but my journey was opening me up into an over-communicator, a processor, and a space-holder, and she neither wanted nor needed any of that. I'd never felt so hyper-aware of the class difference between us as I did walking around the parking lot of the richest mini-mall in town; besides the nicest B&N in town, there was a Williams-Sonoma, a Crate & Barrel, and clothing stores I'd never set foot in. We were much closer to her territory than mine. And however mystifying the dynamic and beguiling her slightly tamer eyes, this was the closest we'd ever get.

We hugged goodbye, a little stiffly. We added each other on Facebook. I think I dropped by her work to say hi once, but she wasn't in. She got married a couple years later to that guy she'd started seeing. When she got pregnant, her face filled out again.

I still think of her whenever the Ting Tings get stuck in my head.
genderjumper: cartoon giraffe, chewing greens, wearing cap & bells (Default)
( You're about to view content that the journal owner has advised should be viewed with discretion. )
genderjumper: cartoon giraffe, chewing greens, wearing cap & bells (Default)
I've been trying to keep one foot in academia (mostly LGBTQ+ caregiving and aging) and one in community health (COVID cautious, combatting health disparities), but increasingly I just want to support the powerful Disability Justice spaces that are emerging as a facilitator, capacity-builder, and networker. I'm terrible at policy/advocacy but engage with many other realms of cultural and political resistance. I maintain a small newsletter and would be happy to boost your virtual and CC events or help put on virtual events.

As a person, I'm a white genderfluid giant, anti-racist since adolescent (though ever-evolving), working class background with a first generation education (Tier 1 BA, state MA in Sociology with a Multicultural Women's and Gender Studies cert, and a Community Health Worker license), nonmonogamous for nearly 20 years (and low-key looking for ways to bridge that somehow).

My neurodivergent traits are often hidden because communication and relationships are longstanding specialized interests -- I'm like a daywalker -- and I've spent the past year uncertain where I fall along the spectrum from pre-disabled to disabled (thanks Long COVID and burnout).

I'm kind of bad at hobbies, but I stim by playing games on BoardGameArena (add me: GJtheUnlit) and make myself take breaks by reading comic strips and music bios or watching weird and wonderful things on streaming.

genderjumper: cartoon giraffe, chewing greens, wearing cap & bells (Default)
I've found myself revisiting one of my earliest quirky, reflexive metaphors several times of late, and [personal profile] flamingsword asked me to explain it. I think I have, at times, called it "The Lifesaver Metaphor", which is more poetic but technically incorrect twice over.

TWO LIFEGUARDS

Two Lifeguards found each other early in life. They had both helped so many people in their brief lives that they saw in one another a shared drive to help others and quickly build a loving relationship out of it. While it wasn't perfect, it often felt too good to be true. "How can another person see me so well?" they each thought.

In celebration of their love, they went on a cruise, but late the first night they both felt overboard. No one on the ship knew they were gone, and since they were the ones who checked on everyone else, who knew how long it would take for someone to notice?

They looked at each other. There was nothing else to see.

Surely my lover will save me, each thought.

They looked at each other. There was nothing else to see.

Almost at the same moment, they spoke:
"We must swim to shore," said one lifeguard. "There are islands all around us, surely we can find land and get help."
"We must stay where we are," said the other lifeguard. "Someone will notice eventually and they will come find us."

They looked at each other. There was nothing else to see.

Surely my lover will save me, each thought.

They looked at each other. There was nothing else to see.

Did they fight? Did they repeat themselves? Did they hurt one another trying to prove something to themselves? Almost certainly.

They looked at each other. There was nothing else to see.

Their thoughts remained in sync: Surely my lover will save me... My lover will save me... My lover can save me...

They looked at each other. There was nothing else to see.

My lover can't save me...

Their parting barely qualified as a goodbye or a break-up, for by this time each was entirely focused on self-preservation.

They didn't look at each other. There was nothing else to say.

One lifeguard swam away. The other lifeguard stayed in place.

And with a little effort, both plans worked: each lifeguard was rescued exactly as hoped. Once they knew the other person was safe, they did not reconnect.

Their lives diverged rapidly.
The lifeguard who swam away continued to find power in action. The lifeguard who stayed continued to find power in staying still. They each helped so many people yet protected themselves a little more than before.

With each passing year, the other lifeguard and the falling overboard and the rescue would take up a smaller space in their memories.

They stopped looking for one another. There was nothing else to see.
genderjumper: cartoon giraffe, chewing greens, wearing cap & bells (Default)
I don't bother thinking very hard about the tension between free will and determinism unless I'm depressed and my usual self-regulation efforts aren't working. But it's rare that I start thinking about them without already noticing the depression and self-regulation stall.

This was not the week I thought I was going to have.
  • I got turned down for a job I really, really wanted. I trust that it's going to lead me to better things (or potentially I reapply later), but a lot of my cognitive load had been going to daydreaming about relocating and now it's not really sure where to go.
  • A trans woman died in my community. I had only met her once or twice: long enough to get a massive crush, not long enough to learn her last name. But I went to the grief circle tonight and offered what support I could to her grieving parents and others.
  • The friend I trust to be untrustworthy may be about to lose one parent to illness and another to the grief. I really wish people would call on a care coach or family diplomat during such difficult times. This particular friend just stormed off and probably got high.
  • Speaking of mental illness, when I started gray-rocking my fam-o about three years ago, I never would have imagined they would just stop participating. I have literally no idea what's happening over there right now, because they each started dealing with heavy shit and they simply do not know how to communicate out of anything other than idleness or overwhelm.
  • My ostensible dating partner and friend of 30+ years abruptly reconnected with an ex last week and derailed our plans to share physical space (which is a big deal because their family doesn't mask consistently so I have to build a lot of faith and request 5 days of relative isolation). I can't help worrying that some of this was sparked by their recent realization that I was going to move away sooner or later, but they are not strong at self-advocacy nor even certain kinds of self-awareness and I horrible at navigating the unspoken.
  • My planned road trip to visit hyper-cautious loved ones in central Texas did not happen because 2/3 of us got nasty spring colds (I allow for the fact it could have been COVID, but I have zero evidence and a lifetime of experience with allergies turning into sinus infections and it felt like the latter; that said, these things just plain heal more slowly than they did before my two cases of COVID).
  • Signs currently point to a new hypomania as I come out of sick-space: the excitement of the big change being redirected into staying calm combined with having been rather idle the past two weeks, so that's why I'm still up at 7am (I did have a 3-hour nap earlier, which is usually navigable for me) documenting some of the goings on instead of sleeping.
  • Have had a strong urge to write the past few days thanks to a writing group I'm co-leading, but I'm wavering between too much and too little to say.
  • My therapist wants to terminate after over ten years together because she has nothing left to teach me, I'm figuring it all out on my own. I agree it's time, but that doesn't mean I'm enthusiastic about it.
I should probably read the Tao or something contemplative, then try again to sleep.
genderjumper: cartoon giraffe, chewing greens, wearing cap & bells (Default)
( You're about to view content that the journal owner has advised should be viewed with discretion. )
genderjumper: cartoon giraffe, chewing greens, wearing cap & bells (Default)
On Journaling... ) The vast majority of the social sciences as we know them are so steeped in "Western" hegemony that studies will be impossible to replicate under other economic, cultural, and technological circumstances. Seeing the present moment, vis à vis pandemic(s), war(s), and corruptions(sss), as roughly an apex or precipice culminated on everything that came before (and with very little room to go anywhere but down), we have a unique birds eye view if we take the time to appreciate it. We have way more information about humans than has ever before been accessible, and we are at the peak of human understanding before it either crashes back down or is handed over to computers to process on our behalf (or hell, maybe both). Why not try to use this purview to leave something behind that is beyond ourselves?

Something that might help the next great society avoid some of our hubris and failings... )... but there's no academic hub I can find that pulls it altogether and says, "This is how human relationships and cultures reflect their material relationship with time." I don't think it could help being metaphysical (even spiritual), but then the emergence of sciences are rarely the cold, calculating laboratories we bias today.

Anyway, if you know any good books on sociotemporality (whatever its authors call it), let me know?

Profile

genderjumper: cartoon giraffe, chewing greens, wearing cap & bells (Default)
Gender Jumper

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123 456
789101112 13
1415 1617181920
212223242526 27
28293031   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 6th, 2026 05:53 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios